|
|
 |
|
"First John McCain, then Max Cleland,
now John Kerry: the Republican attack machine says Vietnam veterans are
crazy and are frauds."
By Stewart Nusbaumer
Intervention Magazine, August 18, 2004
|
A Few Facts
Let's
look at the facts, something that shoots horror into the heart of the
Chickenhawks. John Kerry volunteered for the military and then volunteered for
service in Vietnam, where he was wounded three times and was awarded a Silver
Star and a Bronze Star for valor. We know this is true. George W. Bush supported
the Vietnam War yet avoided fighting in that war by joining the Guard; he
selected the option not to go to Vietnam, then refused to show up for his
physical and lost his right to fly. We know this is true.
Bush also
appears to have been AWOL for many months, if not a year or more. There is
military documentation that says I did not go AWOL, I wonder why the entire
Republican establishment cannot find the same for George Bush?
So who was
dishonorable in their military service during the Vietnam War? ItТs a simple
question with a simple answer when the facts are known.
Yet the
Republican Attack machine is pervasive and powerful, refining its sneak attacks
and hiding its real intensions. They have the money and they have the resources
to do a truly excellent smear job on John Kerry, just ask John McCain and Max
Cleland. The question is, in this election will enough Americans conclude that
John KerryТs conduct during the Vietnam War was dishonorable and will this push
a crucial battleground state or two into George BushТs column? The Republican
attack machine has won in the past, will it now beat John Kerry?
If
enough Americans are given only the steady diet of Fox News propaganda and hear
only the megaphone of corporate media, then Kerry will be beaten.
If
John KerryТs credibility as a soldier in Vietnam is destroyed, then his
political credibility in America will be destroyed. Destroy the honorable
warrior, and then the sleazy non-warrior will win. Ask McCain and Cleland. So
write a letter to your local newspaper, give them the facts, and demand the
truth. Call your television stations and tell them you are sickened by the
slandering of John KerryТs military record. Tell them it is un-American! Call
your radio stations and tell them to forbid innuendoes and slander that stab our
Vietnam veterans in the back. Tell them we are proud Americans, not hiding
cowards. Tell them!
This is your country, not the country of these
Chickenhawk Republicans. But you must be willing to fight for your country, as
did John McCain, Max Cleland, and John Kerry, or it will become their country.
And then America will no longer be America.
http://www.vaiw.org/vet/index.php
Cowards All Around The media should take a
step back and remind us what Bush and Cheney were up to in 1969.
By Michael
Tomasky Web Exclusive: 08.23.04
At first blush, the
treatment given to Michael Dobbs' page-one swift-boat article in Sunday's
Washington Post seems at least vaguely reassuring. There's the neutral
headline "Swift Boat Accounts Incomplete," but below that, a deck-headline
informing readers that "Critics Fail to Disprove Kerry's Version of Vietnam War
Episode." The banner treatment, running across three-fourths of the front page
above the fold, places the onus of proof where it belongs -- on the accusers,
not on Kerry, a point that Bob Novak and others have chosen to ignore, obscure,
or even refute; and in announcing that the proof isn't there, it seems to be a
plus for Kerry.
So what's wrong with this picture? This: The Washington Post
should not even be running such a story -- a takeout of something in the
neighborhood of 2,700 words, I'm guessing, delving into the remotest arcana
about what really happened on the Bay Hap River on March 13, 1969 -- in the
first place. Len Downie and the paper's other editors would undoubtedly argue
that the story represents the Post's tenacity for getting to the truth, without
fear or favor. But what the story actually proves is that a bunch of liars who
have in the past contradicted their own current statements can, if their lies
are outrageous enough and if they have enough money, control the media agenda
and get even the most respected media outlets in the country to focus on
picayune "truths" while missing the larger story.
And the larger story here is clear: John Kerry volunteered for the
Navy, volunteered to go to Vietnam, and then, when he was sitting around Cam
Ranh Bay bored with nothing to do, requested the most dangerous duty a Naval
officer could be given. He saved a man's life. He risked his own every time he
went up into the Mekong Delta. He did more than his country asked. In fact he
didn't even wait for his country to ask.
George W. Bush spent those same years in a state of dissolution at
Yale, and would go on, as we know, to plot how to get out of going to Southeast
Asia. On that subject, here's a choice quote. "I was not prepared to shoot my
eardrum out with a shotgun in order to get a deferment," Bush told the Dallas
Morning News in 1990. "Nor was I willing to go to Canada. So I chose to
better myself by learning how to fly airplanes."
http://www.prospect.org/web/view-web.ww?id=8388
овзовзовзовзовзовзовзовзовзо
FORGET
FAHRENHEIT By Noy Thrupkaew Robert
Greenwald is back, and he's after an even bigger network of lies: the march to
war. http://taponline.c.topica.com/maacz0Taa9qpXbNMEmfbaehosu/
Embedded: Weapons of Mass Deception : How the
Media Failed to Cover the War on Iraq
Schechter says that the civilian casualties were
"rarely shown in the western media," he says that the mainstream media's
coverage "sold the war even as it claimed to be just reporting it," and where
the media did depict the war protests (in some cases it didn't depict them at
all) it did so poorly, ignoring the fact that the war protests were "the largest
global protests in history."
овзовзовзовзовзовзовзовзовзо
Deserter: George Bush's War on
Military Families, Veterans and His Past by Ian
Williams
On Feb 13, 2004, the
Memphis
Flyer published interviews with 2 guardsmen from the Alabama unit where
Bush says he served in 1972. Bob Mintz and Paul Bishop attended regular drills
and are both absolutely certain that Bush never showed up for
duty.
Mintz told the reporter, "I
remember that I heard someone was coming to drill with us from Texas. And it was
implied that it was somebody with political influence. I was a young bachelor
then. I was looking for somebody to prowl around with."
When he didn't show, Mintz thought
Bush had "changed his mind and went somewhere else" to do his duty. No so, in
campaign 2000, Bush was referring to Mintz's unit, and he's sticking to the same
story in 2004.
Mintz spoke of his "negative
reaction" to Bush's dishonesty. "You don't do that as an officer, you don't do
that as a pilot, you don't do it as an important person, and you don't do it as
a citizen. This guy's got a lot of nerve," he said.
Mintz says there were only 25 or
30 pilots on base, "There's no doubt. I would have heard of him, seen him,
whatever," he said. "And if he did any flying at all, on whatever kind of craft,
that would have involved a great number of supportive personnel. It takes a lot
of people to get a plane into the air. But nobody I can think of remembers
him."
Mintz said, "(I) talked to one of
my buddies the other day and asked him if he could remember Bush at drill at any
time, and he said, 'Naw, ol' George wasn't there.'"
His buddy is Paul Bishop. Bishop
voted for Bush in 2000, but says he is now upset about Bush lying about serving
in Alabama. "I never saw hide nor hair of Mr. Bush," he said.
Bishop claims he didn't pay
attention to the lies during campaign 2000, but does since Bush went to war in
Iraq. "It bothered me that he wouldn't 'fess up and say, Okay, guys, I cut out
when the rest of you did your time. He shouldn't have tried to dance around the
subject. I take great exception to that. I spent 39 years defending my country,"
he said.
Bush better not count on getting
votes from these 2 vets. When Bishop was asked if plans to vote for Bush, he
said, "Naw, this goes to an integrity issue." And who will Bob Mintz be voting
for? "Not for any Texas politicians," he says.
Evelyn Pringle
овзовзовзовзовзовзовзовзовзо
John Kerry and other
veterans returned from Vietnam and spoke the truth, today Kerry and veterans are
speaking that same truth.
http://www.vaiw.org/vet/index.php
|
овзовзовзовзовзовзовзовзовзо
|
By Dave Moniz and Jim Drinkard USA
Today, August 23, 2004
|
 |
"At a time when
Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry has come under fire from a
group of retired naval officers who say he lied about his combat record in
Vietnam, questions about President Bush's 1968-73 stint in the Texas Air
National Guard remain unresolved."
|
овзовзовзовзовзовзовзовзовзо
|
By Robert J. Lifton
The Boston GLobe, August 25,
2004 | |
 |
"ON THE FRINGE of
the recent Democratic National Convention in Boston, there was a
miniconvention of a group called Veterans for Peace. Most of the 400-plus
participants were Vietnam veterans, though there were smaller contingents
of veterans of World War II, the Korean War, and the first Gulf War. But
the most dramatic presence was that of a group of new kids on the block,
veterans of the war in Iraq."
овзовзовзовзовзовзовзовзовзо |
Operation Truth Launches
Supporting the
Troops
The following is a speech given by a former
marine who served in Iraq.
Rob Sarra gave this address on memorial day of 2004:
I am a former Marine Sergeant, and veteran of
Operation Iraqi Freedom. I speak to you today in order to remember those Marines
who were killed in action in
Iraq
last year and this year. I was assigned to the 1st Marine Regiment during the
initial combat phase of Operation Iraqi Freedom.On April 8th a day before my
company reached
Baghdad,
we lost our first Marine to enemy fire. PFC G, from Temperance Michigan, was 20
years old and had been in the Marines for 7 months when he was killed by an
enemy sniper as our unit fought across the Diayla River 4 miles outside of
Eastern
Baghdad.
In the ensuing months after the fall of
Baghdad,
my unit lost 3 marines to accidents. Lance Corporal K from
Illinois
was incinerated in an ammo dump explosion. On May 19th, another marine was
severely wounded when an anti aircraft shell he found went off in his hands. He
lost his right eye, disfigured his face, and suffered shrapnel wounds to his
chest and legs. On the same day, Sergeant S, from Beaver Dam,
Wisconsin,
who was a member of my company, drowned when he attempted to rescue the crew of
a helicopter that crashed into the
Shat-Al Hillah
Canal. The 3 crew members on board were killed in the crash. To date, over
790 Americans have lost their lives and countless numbers wounded in a war that
hasn't been "won" but is far from being over.
My unit, the 1st marine regiment, left the
United
States on
January 17th, and invaded
Iraq
on March the 21st. Once we were engaged in combat operations, I felt confused.
We were not fighting Iraqi regular forces, but SaddamТs Fedayeen. At one point,
we were calling the war "Desert
Nam". We were
fighting guerrillas who wore black clothing, carried AK-47s and did not adhere
to our "rules". On the highway north to
Baghdad
we were engaging and slaughtering civilians mistakenly due to the Fedayheen and
their tactics. I found myself and several of my fellow marines asking ourselves
"what are we doing? Where are the WMD's? Who are we
fighting?"
We were told in the outset that
Iraq
was an imminent threat to the
United
States. Some
marines felt that this war was payback for September 11th. Some marines felt
that we were defending our way of life. This wasn't true. How is it that if
Iraq
was such a threat, their own troops couldn't stop us from reaching their capital
in three weeks? We never found any WMD's or signs of battlefield chemical
weapons. We did however, find hundreds of caches of discarded weapons and an
army throwing away their uniforms for civilian clothes so they could escape
certain death and return to their homes and families. We found that once we got
to
Baghdad,
we had no exit strategy. Some of us wondered how we were going to get back out
of
Iraq
when we had bypassed towns teeming with guerrilla fighters. Did they expect us
to fight our way out?
The supply problems that everyone talks about during
the war were not what they seemed. In past conflicts, many American combat units
such as the 101st Airborne at
Bastogne
in WWII and the 1st Marine Regiment at the Chosin Reservoir in
Korea,
have been much worse off supply-wise in combat than we were. Yes it is true that
we were down to one MRE a day for 2 weeks. The fact is that we were outrunning
our supplies and those supply columns were being hit by guerrillas. The only
supply problem I saw was before we crossed the border.
My platoon was short on batteries for our night
vision equipment. I personally went to a nearby Army camp and bought several
cases of AA batteries with the platoon commanders money from a store on base.
Hardware used for mounting night vision goggles on our helmets were also in
short supply. We traded a few cartons of cigarettes with another Marine unit for
50 helmet mounts. Most importantly, there was a lack of enough ballistic plates
for our body armor. Prior to crossing the border, we were told that the plates
will be coming up to us as soon as they got in country. These plates never got
to us. Nevertheless, senior marines were giving up their back ballistic plates
to give to junior marines that had none at all. I did this, and saw my platoon
sergeant and platoon commander do the same. The three of us, and several others
in the platoon went into combat with only one plate in the front of our vests,
and we were frontline infantry.
The only time during the war that made any sense to
us was our arrival in
Baghdad.
People cheered in the streets, we were thrown cartons of local cigarettes,
children gave us flowers which we wore on our body armor. We all felt that this
justified what we had gone through. We felt we had a purpose as we heard stories
from Iraqi civilians about what Saddam did to his own people. A dictator and
regime had been toppled and the people of
Iraq
were free of his reign. We felt as if it had all been worth it. By late April,
we would move south for stabilization operations and would turn from
war-fighters into humanitarians.
Once we began Stabilization Operations in a town
called Al
Hillah, 60 miles south of
Baghdad,
things seemed to be going well. The Iraqis were generally happy that we were
there. We rebuilt schools, got the power back on, and reestablished the police
and fire departments. Unfortunately, as we stayed longer, that sentiment wore
off. The waves and smiles we got when we first moved in were disappearing
quickly and we all had the feeling that we had overstayed our welcome. When we
were told we would be going home, missions and excuses kept popping up and we
were kept in country with no certain end in sight. This was a cause for severe
frustration on all levels in my unit, as well as for our families at home. We
felt as if we had done our part and as combat troops.
Hear It From The
Troops
Operation Truth
http://optruth.com/main.cfm
овзовзовзовзовзовзовзовзовзо
" I say we had better look our nation
searchingly in the face, like a physician diagnosing some deep disease."
--Walt Whitman, "Democratic Vistas"
"The world is a dangerous place, not because of
those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing."
-- Albert Einstein
"First they ignore you then they laugh at you then
they fight you then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi
"Gardens promise reincarnation." --Diane
Ackerman
"We will remember not the words of our enemies,
but the silence of our friends." -- Martin Luther King
Jr.
(<>..<>)
(--)
|